QUANTUM MECHANICS

One of the most amazing facts in physics is that everything in the universe from light to electrons to atoms behaves like both particles and waves at the same time. All of the other weird stuff you might have heard about quantum physics, Schrodinger's cat, God playing dice, spooky action at a distance all of it follows directly the fact that everything has both particles and wave nature.
This might sound crazy. If you look around, you'll see waves in water and particles of rock, and they're nothing alike. So why would you think about combining them? Physicists didn't just decide to mash these things together out of nowhere. Rather, they were led to the dual nature of the universe through a process of small steps, fitting together lots of bits of evidence, like pieces in a puzzle.
Initially there was no technology to observe the quantum level of mass in the 18th century. Some of them tried to know what exactly light is made of and light is divided by using a spectrum and they wanted to see deeply into light, to see the quantum level of light. There's no need for instruments and there's no technology too, and Newton has already given a statement about the light being made of particles.

The first person to seriously suggest the dual nature of light was Albert Einstein in 1905, but he was picking up an earlier idea from Max Plank. Plank explained the colors of light emitted by hot objects, like the filament in a light bulb, but to do it, he needed a desperate trick: he the objects was made up of oscillators that could only emit light in discrete chunks, units of energy that depend on the frequency of the light. Plank was never really happy with this, but Einstein picked it up and ran with it. He applied Planck's idea to light itself, saying that light, Which everyone knew was a wave, is really a stream of photons, each with a discrete amount of energy. 

Einstein himself called this the only truly revolutionary thing he did. But it explains the way light shining on a metal surface knocks loose electrons. Even people who hated the idea had to agree that it works brilliantly. 
The next puzzle piece came from Ernest Rutherford in England. In 1909, Ernest Marsden and Hans Geiger, working for Rutherford, shot alpha particles at gold atoms and were stunned to find that some bounced straight backwards. This showed that most of the mass of the atom is concentrated in a tiny nucleus. The cartoon atom you learn in grade school, with electrons orbiting like a miniature solar system, that's Rutherford's There's one little problem with Rutherford's atom :it can't work. 
Classical physics tells us that an electron whipping around in a circle emits light, and we use this all the time to generate radio waves and X-rays. Rutherford's atoms should spray X-rays in all directions for a brief instant before the electron spiral in to crash into the nucleus.
 But Niels Bohr, a Danish theoretical physicist working with Rutherford, pointed out that atoms obviously exist, so maybe the rules of physics needed to change. Bohr proposed that an electron in certain special orbits doesn't emit any light at all. Atoms observe and emit light only when electrons change orbits and the frequency of the light depends on the energy difference in just the way Planck and Einstein introduced. Bohr's atom fixes Rutherford's problem and explains why atoms emit only very specific colors of light.Each element has its own special orbits, and thus it's own unique set of frequencies.
   The Bohr model has one tiny problem: there is no reason for those orbits to be special. 
Louis de Brogile, a French PHD student, brought everything full circle. He pointed that if light, which everyone knew is a wave, behave like a particle. Maybe the electron, which everyone knew is a particle behaves like a wave.And if electrons are waves, it's easy to explain Bohr's rule for picking out the special orbits. 

Once you have the idea that electrons behave like waves, you can look for it. And within a few years, scientists in the US and UK had observed the wave behavior from electrons. 
These days we have a wonderful demonstration of this : shooting single electrons at a barrier with slits cut in it. Each electron is detected at a specific place at a specific time, like a particle. But when you repeat the experiment many times all the electrons trace out a pattern of strips, characteristics of wave behavior. The idea that particles behave like waves, and vice-versa, is one the strongest and most powerful in physics. 

Richard Feynman famously said that this illustrates the central mystery of quantum mechanics. Everything else follows from this, like pieces of a puzzle falling into place. 
Also read 👇 👇 
Referenced websites 👇 👇 

Comments

  1. new interpretation of QM here: See the alternative of the UNIVERSE in Synthese’s article (USA, 2005) and my Springer’s book (Germany 2015/2016): the “Universe” does not exist, it cannot have any ontology! What really exist are “entities” and their “interactions”. The wrong framework, the “Universe”/“world” is replaced with a new framework the “Epistemologically Different Worlds” (for quantum mechanics, the micro-macro relation, the mind-brain problem, emergence, levels, etc.) (IT IS TOTALLY DIFFERENT THAN EVERETT’s APPROACH!!)
    All my main ideas (the mind-brain problem, main problems of cognitive science and quantum mechanics, Einstein’s relativity vs. quantum mechanics, etc.) from my Springer’s book (2015) can be found in my PhD thesis (2007), UNSW (Sydney, Australia, officially posted on university’s website, FREE, by the university’s Staff in 2007) https://www.unsworks.unsw.edu.au/primo-explore/fulldisplay?vid=UNSWORKS&docid=unsworks_5143&context=L
    My book at SPRINGER (Germany): "Illusions of Human Thinking (2015/2016) - On concepts of Mind, Reality, and Universe in Psychology, Neuroscience and Physics" [manuscript sent to Springer in 2014 and first published (online) in October 2015; on the cover is written 2016! WHY?] This book = summary of the main ideas of my PhD thesis published in 2007 + my first FIVE books (English), all FREE at my webpage! http://filosofie.unibuc.ro/gabriel_vacariu/ Many books/articles FREE at https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gabriel_Vacariu/publications (I have 12 published books on the main problems of Physics, Cognitive Neuroscience and Philosophy (philosophy of mind/physics/metaphysics/ontology/etc., all English!)
    ATTENTION: Gabriel Vacariu, (May 2021 to 2014) The UNBELIEVABLE SIMILARITIES between my ideas (2002-2020) and the ideas of other people [in physics (quantum mechanics, cosmology), cognitive neuroscience, philosophy of mind, and philosophy (this manuscript would require a REVOLUTION in international academy environment!)] FREE at
    https://www.academia.edu/s/e6221c837b
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351749095_2021_2014_Gabriel_Vacariu_UNBELIEVABLE_similarities
    340621608_April_2020_2014_Gabriel_Vacariu_UNBELIEVABLE_similarities_odf https://philpapers.org/rec/VACQS
    My personal webpage: https://sites.google.com/view/gabrielvacariuphilosophybuchar/home
    VIDEOCLIP: May 11th, 2020: Gabriel Vacariu's presentation for Department of Physics, Pabna University of Science and Techonology, Pabna, Bangladesh, for International Physics Webinar_153, organized by Pretam Kumar Das (physicist at that university): "The EDWs and Quantum Mechanics" here:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14Q2mPTa4to&ab_channel=PretamKumarDas

    ReplyDelete
  2. Super nice explanation brother

    ReplyDelete
  3. Amazing article . Physics in a nutshell

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libet Experiment,Quantum Mechanics, Determism And Free Will.

The Quantum Internet Will Blow Your Mind. Here’s What It Will Look Like

Does a chair exist if nobody sees it? Relational quantum mechanics says ‘NO! ’